March 14, 2015
Team Results | Team Record | Winning % | Points | GF | GA | Diff | Last 5 | Streak |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rivers | 16-1-0 | .941 | 32 | 56 | 18 | +38 | 4-1-0 | W4 |
Berwick | 19-2-3 | .854 | 41 | 108 | 23 | +85 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Dexter Southfield | 11-3-2 | .750 | 24 | 58 | 27 | +31 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Canterbury | 9-3-1 | .731 | 19 | 41 | 17 | +24 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Proctor | 13-5-1 | .711 | 27 | 55 | 27 | +28 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Worcester Academy | 10-4-2 | .688 | 22 | 51 | 29 | +22 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Hebron | 15-7-0 | .682 | 30 | 66 | 42 | +24 | 3-2-0 | W1 |
Kimball Union | 10-5-2 | .647 | 22 | 32 | 20 | +12 | 4-1-0 | W3 |
Millbrook | 8-6-0 | .571 | 16 | 30 | 24 | +6 | 5-0-0 | W5 |
St. George's | 5-4-2 | .545 | 12 | 28 | 15 | +13 | 2-2-1 | L2 |
Frederick Gunn School | 6-5-1 | .542 | 13 | 28 | 24 | +4 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
Brooks | 6-5-1 | .542 | 13 | 41 | 32 | +9 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
Governor's | 6-6-0 | .500 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 3-2-0 | W1 |
Groton | 8-9-2 | .474 | 18 | 34 | 35 | -1 | 1-3-1 | L1 |
North Yarmouth Academy | 6-11-3 | .375 | 15 | 31 | 44 | -13 | 0-3-2 | L2 |
Vermont Academy | 7-12-0 | .368 | 14 | 39 | 62 | -23 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
Holderness | 6-11-2 | .368 | 14 | 29 | 43 | -14 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
Middlesex | 5-10-0 | .333 | 10 | 31 | 41 | -10 | 1-4-0 | W1 |
Tilton | 5-12-0 | .294 | 10 | 35 | 58 | -23 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
Thayer | 3-10-2 | .267 | 8 | 22 | 58 | -36 | 2-3-0 | W2 |
Kingswood Oxford | 1-10-0 | .091 | 2 | 16 | 44 | -28 | 0-5-0 | L7 |
Pingree | 1-14-0 | .067 | 2 | 7 | 74 | -67 | 0-5-0 | L8 |
Kents Hill | 0-14-1 | .033 | 1 | 15 | 66 | -51 | 0-4-1 | L2 |
Portsmouth Abbey | 5-4-0 | .556 | 10 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
Greenwich Academy | 2-5-1 | .313 | 5 | 8 | 22 | -14 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
Newton Country Day | 2-7-0 | .222 | 4 | 8 | 25 | -17 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
*
Standings are generated automatically based on submitted game results & record against NEPSAC Opponents (i.e. excluding affiliates).
Rankings are based on Team Winning Percentage (Wins + [Ties/2]) / (Total Games Played).
Rankings are for display purposes only and may not meet
actual strength-of-schedule criteria.