March 13, 2008
DII NE Prep Girls Hockey Standings 2007-08*
| Team Results | Team Record | Winning % | Points | GF | GA | Diff | Last 5 | Streak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kingswood Oxford | 14-1-1 | .906 | 29 | 60 | 23 | +37 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
| Governor's | 11-3-0 | .786 | 22 | 65 | 22 | +43 | 4-1-0 | W3 |
| Proctor | 14-4-1 | .763 | 29 | 75 | 31 | +44 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
| Middlesex | 7-3-0 | .700 | 14 | 23 | 18 | +5 | 4-1-0 | W2 |
| Greenwich Academy | 8-4-1 | .654 | 17 | 38 | 28 | +10 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
| Groton | 10-6-0 | .625 | 20 | 53 | 40 | +13 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
| Kents Hill | 10-6-1 | .618 | 21 | 42 | 39 | +3 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
| Holderness | 6-6-2 | .500 | 14 | 18 | 24 | -6 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
| Kimball Union | 6-6-1 | .500 | 13 | 37 | 35 | +2 | 3-1-1 | T1 |
| Hebron | 6-6-0 | .500 | 12 | 37 | 37 | 0 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| St. George's | 5-5-2 | .500 | 12 | 21 | 26 | -5 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
| North Yarmouth Academy | 8-10-1 | .447 | 17 | 60 | 63 | -3 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
| Vermont Academy | 4-6-1 | .409 | 9 | 28 | 29 | -1 | 2-2-1 | T1 |
| Berwick | 4-7-1 | .375 | 9 | 33 | 44 | -11 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
| Dexter Southfield | 5-9-1 | .367 | 11 | 39 | 49 | -10 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
| Thayer | 3-9-1 | .269 | 7 | 27 | 41 | -14 | 1-4-0 | L4 |
| Portsmouth Abbey | 3-10-0 | .231 | 6 | 34 | 72 | -38 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
| Canterbury | 1-8-2 | .182 | 4 | 16 | 30 | -14 | 1-3-1 | L1 |
| Tilton | 1-10-0 | .091 | 2 | 16 | 35 | -19 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
| Pingree | 0-13-0 | .000 | 0 | 12 | 88 | -76 | 0-5-0 | L13 |
| Rivers | 8-0-1 | .944 | 17 | 42 | 8 | +34 | 5-0-0 | W8 |
| Newton Country Day | 5-2-1 | .688 | 11 | 31 | 26 | +5 | 3-2-0 | W2 |
| Frederick Gunn School | 6-3-0 | .667 | 12 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 3-2-0 | W1 |
| Brooks | 3-5-1 | .389 | 7 | 19 | 17 | +2 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
| Millbrook | 1-7-1 | .167 | 3 | 14 | 23 | -9 | 1-3-1 | W1 |
*
Standings are generated automatically based on submitted game results & record against NEPSAC Opponents (i.e. excluding affiliates).
Rankings are based on Team Winning Percentage (Wins + [Ties/2]) / (Total Games Played).
Rankings are for display purposes only and may not meet
actual strength-of-schedule criteria.
