March 14, 2011
DII NE Prep Girls Hockey Standings 2010-11*
| Team Results | Team Record | Winning % | Points | GF | GA | Diff | Last 5 | Streak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Governor's | 15-0-0 | 1.000 | 30 | 105 | 21 | +84 | 5-0-0 | W15 |
| Canterbury | 12-2-1 | .833 | 25 | 48 | 15 | +33 | 5-0-0 | W5 |
| Rivers | 10-2-1 | .808 | 21 | 50 | 25 | +25 | 5-0-0 | W5 |
| Dexter Southfield | 14-4-0 | .778 | 28 | 74 | 26 | +48 | 4-1-0 | W2 |
| Proctor | 14-6-1 | .690 | 29 | 66 | 39 | +27 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
| Hebron | 13-6-0 | .684 | 26 | 59 | 43 | +16 | 4-1-0 | W4 |
| Millbrook | 7-3-1 | .682 | 15 | 31 | 26 | +5 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Thayer | 9-5-1 | .633 | 19 | 55 | 40 | +15 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Middlesex | 7-4-1 | .625 | 15 | 45 | 29 | +16 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
| Kimball Union | 9-6-4 | .579 | 22 | 47 | 48 | -1 | 3-1-1 | W3 |
| Berwick | 7-6-0 | .538 | 14 | 55 | 43 | +12 | 4-1-0 | W3 |
| Tilton | 8-8-1 | .500 | 17 | 38 | 51 | -13 | 1-4-0 | L4 |
| Brooks | 6-6-2 | .500 | 14 | 33 | 30 | +3 | 3-1-1 | L1 |
| Pingree | 5-7-0 | .417 | 10 | 33 | 41 | -8 | 1-4-0 | L4 |
| Vermont Academy | 5-9-2 | .375 | 12 | 35 | 56 | -21 | 1-3-1 | L1 |
| St. George's | 5-10-1 | .344 | 11 | 54 | 70 | -16 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
| Frederick Gunn School | 4-8-0 | .333 | 8 | 22 | 26 | -4 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
| Holderness | 3-11-5 | .289 | 11 | 24 | 41 | -17 | 0-4-1 | L2 |
| North Yarmouth Academy | 5-14-1 | .275 | 11 | 38 | 68 | -30 | 2-3-0 | L2 |
| Groton | 3-13-0 | .188 | 6 | 32 | 69 | -37 | 1-4-0 | L1 |
| Kents Hill | 2-14-0 | .125 | 4 | 23 | 79 | -56 | 1-4-0 | W1 |
| Kingswood Oxford | 3-5-0 | .375 | 6 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
| Greenwich Academy | 2-5-2 | .333 | 6 | 17 | 26 | -9 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
| Newton Country Day | 2-7-0 | .222 | 4 | 22 | 42 | -20 | 1-4-0 | L2 |
| Portsmouth Abbey | 0-9-0 | .000 | 0 | 14 | 61 | -47 | 0-5-0 | L9 |
*
Standings are generated automatically based on submitted game results & record against NEPSAC Opponents (i.e. excluding affiliates).
Rankings are based on Team Winning Percentage (Wins + [Ties/2]) / (Total Games Played).
Rankings are for display purposes only and may not meet
actual strength-of-schedule criteria.
