March 14, 2009
DII NE Prep Girls Hockey Standings 2008-09*
| Team Results | Team Record | Winning % | Points | GF | GA | Diff | Last 5 | Streak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rivers | 13-0-0 | 1.000 | 26 | 71 | 14 | +57 | 5-0-0 | W13 |
| Governor's | 13-2-0 | .867 | 26 | 90 | 26 | +64 | 4-1-0 | W3 |
| Thayer | 12-3-0 | .800 | 24 | 60 | 25 | +35 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Proctor | 16-6-2 | .708 | 34 | 94 | 57 | +37 | 1-3-1 | L1 |
| Hebron | 9-4-1 | .679 | 19 | 43 | 35 | +8 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
| Dexter Southfield | 13-6-1 | .675 | 27 | 78 | 44 | +34 | 3-2-0 | W2 |
| Greenwich Academy | 10-5-1 | .656 | 21 | 45 | 32 | +13 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
| North Yarmouth Academy | 12-7-1 | .625 | 25 | 63 | 51 | +12 | 1-4-0 | L2 |
| Millbrook | 6-4-1 | .591 | 13 | 31 | 20 | +11 | 4-1-0 | W3 |
| Canterbury | 8-8-2 | .500 | 18 | 44 | 37 | +7 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
| Newton Country Day | 6-6-1 | .500 | 13 | 37 | 39 | -2 | 2-3-0 | W2 |
| Frederick Gunn School | 5-5-0 | .500 | 10 | 21 | 22 | -1 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
| Berwick | 7-8-1 | .469 | 15 | 39 | 45 | -6 | 3-2-0 | L1 |
| Holderness | 7-9-0 | .438 | 14 | 28 | 39 | -11 | 2-3-0 | W1 |
| Kingswood Oxford | 5-7-4 | .438 | 14 | 32 | 39 | -7 | 2-2-1 | L1 |
| Brooks | 5-7-1 | .423 | 11 | 26 | 36 | -10 | 4-1-0 | L1 |
| Middlesex | 5-8-0 | .385 | 10 | 38 | 47 | -9 | 3-2-0 | W3 |
| Kents Hill | 5-9-0 | .357 | 10 | 31 | 49 | -18 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
| Kimball Union | 5-10-2 | .353 | 12 | 28 | 45 | -17 | 2-2-1 | W1 |
| St. George's | 4-10-0 | .286 | 8 | 30 | 57 | -27 | 2-3-0 | L1 |
| Tilton | 4-11-1 | .281 | 9 | 27 | 52 | -25 | 1-3-1 | L2 |
| Portsmouth Abbey | 3-8-0 | .273 | 6 | 32 | 53 | -21 | 1-4-0 | L2 |
| Groton | 2-11-3 | .219 | 7 | 23 | 53 | -30 | 0-4-1 | L3 |
| Vermont Academy | 2-11-1 | .179 | 5 | 25 | 58 | -33 | 1-4-0 | L3 |
| Pingree | 0-12-1 | .038 | 1 | 16 | 77 | -61 | 0-4-1 | L2 |
*
Standings are generated automatically based on submitted game results & record against NEPSAC Opponents (i.e. excluding affiliates).
Rankings are based on Team Winning Percentage (Wins + [Ties/2]) / (Total Games Played).
Rankings are for display purposes only and may not meet
actual strength-of-schedule criteria.
